Factional leadership disputes in organizations like NANS often stem from disagreements over election results or perceived legitimacy. In this case, it appears that Olusola Ladoja, currently recognized as the legitimate NANS president, has dismissed claims of another person, Atiku, claiming the position without participating in the official convention.

Such disputes can arise due to several reasons:

1. Disagreement Over Election Processes: Sometimes, members dispute the election process, claiming it wasn't fair or transparent. Ladoja mentions he was elected through what he calls a transparent and democratic process, which he believes validates his position.

2. Power Struggles: In any organization, humans inherently vie for power. This scenario seems to involve a straightforward battle over who holds the legitimate power, where Ladoja sees claims otherwise as laughable and even fraudulent.

3. Miscommunication and External Influence: External influence or misunderstanding among members can also cause rifts that lead to factions. In such scenarios, leaders like Ladoja often emphasize their independence from external constraints.

I've seen similar situations play out in student bodies during my college years. Clear communication and strong leadership usually help, but it's always a tough ride!

In any case, these disputes bring to light the importance of robust governance and clarity in communication within organizations to prevent internal splits.