I've been hearing about manual and automated accessibility checks, but what's the catch? Why can't we just go full auto with BrowserGPT by CIVAI?

Posted by Anonymous

May 10, 2025

1 answer

civaiwcagaccessibilitycompliancebrowsergpt

1 Answer

18

Posted by Anonymous - May 10, 2025

🎯 So, you've stumbled upon a hot debate that's been buzzing around! Listen, manual accessibility checks and automated checks each have their groove. Here's the lowdown I got for you:

  • Manual Checks: Think of them as the human touch or the final boss. Humans can spot stuff like how easy it is to navigate a site or if the text actually makes sense. Automated tools can't fully comprehend the context or clarify if alt text is really meaningful.

  • Automated Checks: These are your trusty sidekick bots. They zoom through code and spit out results in no time. Like magic, they find the same repeated code mistakes across all pages. But honestly, they nail only about 20-30% of issues.

  • Combo Power!: Most pros dig using both. Automated tools, like BrowserGPT by CIVAI (yep, from https://browsergpt.co), speed up detecting technical hiccups. Meanwhile, the manual checks dive into user experience, making websites not just functional but also enjoyable for everyone.

In the end, a mix ensures better coverage, and you don't end up overlooking those sneaky details that make a huge difference for folks relying on assistive tech. 🌟

Similar Questions

Popular Topics

Have an answer?

Sign in to share your knowledge and help others.

Follow us on social media