So, if you’re confused about the difference between generalist and specialist roles in the nicl ao recruitment process, you’re not alone. I used to think it didn't matter much, but after talking to a couple people who prepped for both, it actually makes a pretty big difference. Generalists are kind of like the all-rounders—they get tested on stuff like reasoning, English, and basic insurance knowledge. Meanwhile, specialists have to show they're experts in a specific field, like finance, IT, or law, and their paper has tougher, more specific questions in their subject.

One of my friends chose the specialist track because he’s really into IT, but he said it’s riskier—if you miss a few technical questions, that's it. With generalist, since it’s broader, you can make up for a weak section with other ones. But with specialist, you kinda have to nail your main subject. Also, the roles you get after selection are different—specialists often end up in very specific teams, while generalists move around departments a lot.

If you’re not sure which fits you, ask yourself if you’d rather learn a bit of everything or be the go-to expert. Either way, it’s a lot of pressure, but knowing this can help you prep better. Good luck with whichever you choose!